Einige Forscher sehen darin sogar d

Einige Forscher sehen darin sogar den Beweis, dass die technische Entwicklung beim Menschen Entwicklungen bewirkt, für die früher viele Generationen nötig gewesen wären. Eine Übertreibung? Oder ist der Daumen tatsächlich der "Superfinger" des Informationszeitalters, wie die Londoner Tageszeitung Observer schwärmte?

Results (English) 1:

some researchers even see the evidence that the technical development causes the human developments, many earlier generations would have been needed for. an exaggeration? or the thumb is actually the "super finger" of the information age, such as London's Observer newspaper enthused?

Results (English) 2:

Some researchers see even proof that the technical development in humans causes developments for the earlier generations would have been needed. An exaggeration? The thumb actually is the "Super finger" of the information age as the London daily newspaper enthused observer?

Results (English) 3:

Some researchers see in it even the proof that the technical development causes developments with humans, for whom in former times many generations would have been necessary. An exaggeration? Or is the thumb actual the “superfinger” of the information age, how the London daily paper Observer swarmed?